Antibacterial Activity of Red Pine (Pinus densiflora) and Sumatran Pine (Pinus merkusii) Leaf Extracts against Oral Pathogens

Wedagama, Dewa Made and Wahjuningrum, Dian Agustin and Subiyanto, Ari and Pangestika, Fami Widya and Guspiari, Kirana and Goenharto, Setyabudi and Gopikrishna, Velayutham (2021) Antibacterial Activity of Red Pine (Pinus densiflora) and Sumatran Pine (Pinus merkusii) Leaf Extracts against Oral Pathogens. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. pp. 559-562.

[thumbnail of Similarity of Antibacterial Activity of Red Pine (Pinus densiflora) and Sumatran Pine (Pinus merkusii) Leaf Extracts against Oral Pathogens] Text (Similarity of Antibacterial Activity of Red Pine (Pinus densiflora) and Sumatran Pine (Pinus merkusii) Leaf Extracts against Oral Pathogens)
1. Antibacterial Activity of Red Pine.pdf - Other

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of Korespondensi of Antibacterial Activity of Red Pine (Pinus densiflora) and Sumatran Pine (Pinus merkusii) Leaf Extracts against Oral Pathogens] Text (Korespondensi of Antibacterial Activity of Red Pine (Pinus densiflora) and Sumatran Pine (Pinus merkusii) Leaf Extracts against Oral Pathogens)
1. Koresponden Antibacterial Activity of Red Pine (Pinus densiflora).pdf - Other

Download (2MB)

Abstract

The aim of the experiment was to find out the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of P. densiflora and P. merkusii leaf extracts. Dental and oral diseases are potentially caused by some oral pathogens. Various antimicrobial agents have been developed to prevent dental diseases because they have more minimal side effects than synthetic ones. Red pine (Pinus densiflora) and Sumatran pine (Pinus merkusii) have active compounds such as Triterpenoid, Limonene, Benzoic acid, Cinnamic acid, Tannin, Flavonoid, and Saponin that potentially develop natural antibacterial agents. P. densiflora and P. merkusii leaf extracts were tested for their antibacterial activity against Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans, and Phorymonas gingivalis which grew in BHI (Brain Heart Infusion) Broth. The MIC and MBC values were determined by calculating the growth of bacterial colonies on NA media in CFU/ml. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey with SPSS for windows. The result showed a very significant different (P< 0.05) with MIC of P. merkusii was at 0.39%, 0.39%, and 0.78%, and MBCs of 0.78%, 0.78%, and 1.56%. While P. merkusii were at the MICs of 1.56%, 1.56%, and 3.125%, and at the MBCs of 3.125%, 3.125%, and 6.25% against E. Faecalis, S. mutans, and P. gingivalis. The result indicates that P. densiflora and P. merkusii had the antibacterial activity against E. faecalis, S. mutans, and P. gingivalis.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Antimicrobial activity, Pinus densiflora, Pinus merkusii, MIC, MBC
Subjects: ZA General Works > AI Indexes (General)
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email [email protected]
Date Deposited: 04 May 2023 04:03
Last Modified: 04 May 2023 04:03
URI: http://eprints.unmas.ac.id/id/eprint/3140

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item